Court of Justice of the European Union Rules  that Notarial Procedures do not Violate  European Union’s Sanctions against Russia

Court of Justice of the European Union Rules  that Notarial Procedures do not Violate  European Union’s Sanctions against Russia

In the decision numbered C-109/23, the Court of  Justice of the European Union (“CJEU”) ruled  that a notary’s approval of the sale of a property  belonging to an unlisted Russian company did not  violate European Union’s (“EU”) sanctions  against Russia.  

Pursuant to Article 5n(2a) of Council Regulation  (EU) No 833/2014 of 31 July 2014, as amended  by Council Regulation (EU) No 2022/1904 of 6  October 2022, on the restrictive measures  imposed as a result of the Russian invasion of  Ukraine, it is prohibited to provide legal advice  and consultancy services directly or indirectly to  a legal person, institution or organization  established in Russia.  

Facts of the Case  

A Russian company headquartered in Moscow,  which has owned a property registered in Berlin,  Germany since 2013, has decided to sell this  property in 2022. Pursuant to German law, the  relevant contract must be notarized in order for  the sale of real estate to take place. A notary in  Germany refused to notarize the contract for the  sale of the apartment on the grounds that it would 

Evaluation of the CJEU 

The CJEU stated that notaries act in an impartial  manner, at an equal distance from the interests of  the contracting parties, and that the notary’s  notarization of a contract for the sale of  immovable property belonging to a Russian legal  person does not fall within the concept of “legal  advisory services” referred to in Article 5n(2a) of  Regulation (EU) No 833/2014. Also, CJEU  claimed that the notarization is not legal advice  aimed at promoting the private interests of the  parties. Moreover, according to the CJEU, the  services of an interpreter acting in the context of  the transfer of the purchase price to the seller, the  cancellation of the fees imposed on the property,  the registration of the transfer of ownership in the  Land Registry and the notarization do not amount  to legal advice and are also not covered by the  legal prohibition.  

Conclusion 

Notaries do not represent any of the contracting  parties and approach all parties to the legal  transaction in an independent and impartial  manner. According to the CJEU, transactions  carried out by notaries do not fall within the legal  advisory service referred to in Article 5n(2a) of  the Regulation as they do not concern the interests  of the parties. This is because nothing in the  Regulation imposes a general prohibition on the  exclusion of a person from a transaction solely on  the grounds of his or her residence in Russia or on  the transfer of immovable property located in the  territory of the European Union and belonging to  such a person. This judgment is significant as the  CJEU made an exception to the sanctions  imposed by the EU on Russia.  

Note: The Decision also states that translation  services provided by an interpreter to assist a  person who does not speak the language in which 

No template content post in Elementor Template