Constitutional Court Decides on Violation  of the Right to Respect for Private Life  for Izdemir Thermal Power Plant II

Constitutional Court Decides on Violation  of the Right to Respect for Private Life  for Izdemir Thermal Power Plant II

The Constitutional Court (“Court”)  evaluated the applications regarding the  dismissal of the appeals of the lawsuits filed  for the annulment of the environmental  impact assessment (“EIA”) positive  decisions regarding the İZDEMİR Thermal  Power Plant II project operated by İzmir  Demir Çelik Sanayi A.Ş. (“İZDEMİR”) in  Aliağa district of İzmir and ruled that the  applicants’ right to respect for private life  guaranteed by the Constitution was violated.  

The local community, environmental  associations and professional chambers had  filed a claim on the grounds that the  construction of the power plant would pose  environmental risks, negatively affect  agricultural life in the region, especially olive  cultivation, cause deforestation and climate  change.  

In its decision, the Court emphasized the  importance of a comprehensive analysis of  the environmental impacts of projects, also  noted that the project would seriously affect  the applicants’ living spaces, which would  lead to a violation of their private lives. The Constitutional Court noted that the right to  respect for private life is a fundamental right  for the protection of individuals’ living spaces  and that this right must be balanced with the  public interest.

Drawing attention to the state’s positive  obligation under the right to respect for  private life, the Constitutional Court  concluded that the public authorities did not  approach the case with due diligence and did  not sufficiently consider public and  individual interests.  

It is important to note that in the  aforementioned decision, the court  underlined that the approval of the project  without assessing the environmental impacts  of the power plant is a situation that threatens  the quality of life of individuals. The fact that  the court emphasized this point means that in  similar cases, first instance courts should  obtain an expert report on environmental  impacts.

No template content post in Elementor Template